|
This report investigates the outcomes from lower-level Australian
Qualifications Framework (AQF) qualifications (certificates I and II)
for young people (aged 15 to 24 years). These qualifications are aimed
at developing basic vocational skills or preparatory access skills.
They may also lead to further study. A prime motivation for young people
undertaking these qualifications is to facilitate transition into the
labour market.
Data were analysed primarily from two of the national data
collections held by the National Centre for Vocational Education Research
(NCVER). The 2003 Student Outcomes Survey was used to investigate employment
and further study outcomes, as well as young people's motivations for
undertaking lower-level AQF qualifications. These data were supplemented
by longer-term outcome information from NCVER's 2004 Down the Track
Survey of young people. The NCVER's National VET Provider Collection
(for 2002 and 2003) was the other main data collection used to gain
a picture of where certificate I and II qualifications sit in terms
of overall enrolments, and also the projected rates of completion for
these courses; that is, what proportion of students graduate.
Throughout the report, outcomes are analysed for both graduates
(full course completers) and non-graduates ('subjects only' completers),
for both certificate I and certificate II level programs, for males and
females, and for those aged 15 to 19 and 20 to 24 years. Outcomes were
also analysed for students who had enrolled in preparatory courses at
certificate levels I and II. Where relevant, outcomes from certificate
III courses are used to provide comparative 'benchmark' data, as this
qualification level is considered to be the core of the vocational education
and training (VET) system.
Findings
The findings on outcomes should be considered in the context
of young people's motivations for undertaking certificate I and II courses.
The data indicate that very small proportions (less than 10%) of young
people undertook their course for further study reasons. The majority
of students reported that they undertook the course for employment-related
reasons, while a significant proportion reported personal interest as
a motivation, particularly those who undertook single subjects within
the full certificate I and II qualifications. Females were found to
be more likely to report personal interest and further study as motivations.
A key finding of the research is that few young people who
enrol in certificate I and II courses complete. Our analyses projected
that about 33% of certificate I students eventually complete a course,
while about 43% of certificate II students do. Young people in the 15
to 19-years age group are considerably more likely to complete a course
than those in the 20 to 24-years age group.
When we looked at employment outcomes from these courses,
we found that there were reasonable outcomes for 15 to 19-year-old graduates
in terms of gaining full-time employment-there were about 25 percentage
points more employed full-time after the course than before the course.
They were not as good for 20 to 24-year-olds where there was an 11-percentage
points' difference in terms of those employed full-time before the course
and those employed full-time after the course. They were also not as
good for subjects-only completers, where there was generally less than
10 percentage points difference between those employed full-time before
the course and those employed full-time after the course. As we noted
earlier, these subjects-only completers formed the majority of young
people undertaking certificate I and II courses.
The investigation of employment outcomes also included analyses
of young people who reported career advancement benefits, namely increased
earnings and promotion. These were found not to be significant outcomes
of these courses, with the exception of 20 to 24-year-old certificate
II graduates, where about a quarter of young people reported these benefits.
The proportions of young people reporting no job-related
benefit from the course were quite substantial at the certificate I
and II levels. We found that over a third of graduates reported no job—related
benefit from the course. The proportions were even higher for subjects-only
completers, where over 40% of certificate I subjects-only completers
and over a half of certificate II subjects-only completers reported
no job-related benefit from the course. Subjects-only completers comprise the
majority, which means that large proportions overall reported no job-related
benefit from the course.
Our research also investigated the degree to which young people go on to further study after undertaking
certificate I and II level courses and subjects. First of all we estimated
the proportions enrolling in further study at a higher level six months
after the initial course; following this, the proportions completing
a further qualification 30 months after the initial training were
estimated. These analyses showed that over 40% of graduates at certificate
II level and a little over a third of graduates at certificate I level
had enrolled in further study at a higher level. Within 30 months
after the initial training, about 40% of certificate II graduates
and 28% of certificate I graduates had completed a further qualification,
either at the same or higher level. It is important to remember, however,
that graduates formed the minority of young people who had undertaken
certificate I and II courses.
By comparison, less than 10% of subjects-only completers
overall enrolled in further study at a higher level. We also found that
only about 8% of certificate I and 18% of certificate II subjects-only
completers had completed a further course within 30 months after the
initial training.
Finally, we investigated the outcomes of young people undertaking
preparatory courses using the mixed field category from the National
VET Provider Collection as a proxy for preparatory courses. These formed
a substantial proportion of enrolments at certificate I level (about
47%) and about 10% of enrolments at certificate II level. Overall, outcomes
from these courses appeared quite poor. Students in these courses are
projected to have very low rates of completing courses (about 25% at
certificate I level and 28% at certificate II level). They have poor
employment outcomes, with few gaining full-time employment after the
course, and in addition, it is estimated that considerably less than
20% enrol in further study at a higher level. The preparatory nature
of these courses needs to be kept in mind, however, with students possibly
gaining other shorter-term benefits from the courses, such as increased
self-esteem and confidence, which may facilitate their going on to employment
or further study at a later time.
Conclusions
Outcomes for young people from certificate I and II level VET programs could be described as
fair. While there are some reasonable full-time employment outcomes
for 15 to 19-year-old graduates (about 25 percentage points more employed
full-time after the course than before), they were not quite as good
for 20 to 24-year-old graduates (about 11 percentage points more employed
full-time after the course than before the course). Subjects-only
completers, who were projected to form about 67% of young people at
certificate I level and 57% at certificate II level, did not have
overall as good employment outcomes as graduates (generally less than
ten percentage points more were employed full-time after the course
than before the course). We also found that significant proportions
reported no job-related benefit from the course. In addition, only
a minority of young people were projected to enrol in further study
at a higher level (just under a quarter), or to complete a further
qualification. As well, the immediate and further study outcomes for
young people enrolled in preparatory courses were quite poor, although
it needs to be kept in mind that preparatory courses may offer other
benefits.
|