|
This report explores the concept of fully
on-the-job training through the eyes of registered training organisations
and trainees involved with this type of training. The Australian National
Training Authority (ANTA) defines fully on-the-job training as ‘training
undertaken in the workplace as part of the productive work of the learner’ (ANTA
2003). Up to 100% of this training may be delivered as part of the everyday
working experience of trainees, although in reality this is rarely the case.
For the purpose of this study ‘fully on-the-job’ merely refers to training,
the majority of which is based in the workplace. Where reference is
made to ‘trainees’, this may refer to a person undertaking either a traineeship
or an apprenticeship.
Findings are presented from a research study examining factors of
the training that may contribute to its effectiveness as well as ways
in which fully on-the-job training may be improved. For this purpose
DBM Consultants conducted a survey that identified registered training
organisations’ roles and responsibilities, the strengths and weaknesses
of fully on-the-job training, mechanisms for quality assurance and student
satisfaction.
The survey tool
At the outset, 36 semi-structured interviews were conducted with representatives
of registered training organisations to gain an understanding of perceptions
of the relevant aspects to be investigated. Of these interviews, 20
were conducted with private training organisations, six with technical
and further education (TAFE) representatives, five with enterprises
and another five with group training companies. The interviews assisted
in identifying issues for inclusion in the main questionnaire survey.
These issues were further defined by conducting focus groups with trainees
to establish their view of critical aspects of their training.
The questionnaire survey focused on determining the level of satisfaction
that students experienced both before they began training and during
training in relation to the course content, role of the training company,
assessment process and training usefulness. Some demographic information
relating to the sample (in the year 2000) was also collected.
Registered training organisation and trainee views in a nutshell
Interviews with registered training organisation staff pointed to the
need for a balanced approach to training. Registered training organisation
mentors believed that trainees received a sufficiently broad and flexible
learning experience. Regular contact and a good relationship between
not only the employer and the registered training organisation (where
the employer is not a registered training organisation), and also between
the registered organisation and the trainee, were identified by both
parties as essential components of effective fully on-the-job training.
Key perceptions held by registered training organisations and trainees
that may contribute to an understanding of how fully on-the-job training
could be improved were identified as follows.
How registered training organisations view fully on-the-job
training
Registered training organisations acknowledged their responsibility
for the trainees’ working conditions and the need for these to be conducive
to a good learning environment. Areas of responsibility included:
- bridging any training gaps caused by a lack of skill or resources
on behalf of the employer
- advising, supporting, motivating and mentoring trainees and employers
- monitoring the trainees’ working conditions, including the awareness
of responsibilities and requirements, on behalf of both the trainees
and the employers.
Beyond these points raised by registered training organisations, the Standards
for registered training organisations apply in all states and
territories. As part of the Australian Quality Training Framework
these standards seek registered training organisation compliance with
a variety of requirements. Those of particular interest to fully on-the-job
trainees include:
- negotiation of training delivery and assessment with employers and
learners
- cooperation with employers to integrate on-the-job training components
- scheduling of workplace visits to monitor/review training and assessment. (ANTA
2001)
Overall, registered training organisations were in favour of training
that occurred predominantly on the job but expressed some concerns regarding
the quality of training processes and content. They highlighted the
following strengths and weaknesses
Strengths and weaknesses
Where the employer is also the registered training organisation, an
obvious advantage of fully on-the-job training includes financial benefits
through government incentives. Employers also valued the fact that
training (including its pace) could be customised to suit trainees.
They felt that a significant amount of incidental learning occurred
on the job, making training highly relevant to the job and industry.
Furthermore, ongoing employment opportunities for trainees can be directly
identified.
Registered training organisations raised concerns with trainees identifying
themselves as ‘workers’ rather than ‘students’. It was felt that opportunities
to network with other trainees outside the company are limited. They
also identified competing work and study loads as a problem. It was
thought that these impinge on a trainee’s efforts to complete their
training. Weaknesses also included insufficient theoretical training,
as well as employers’ lack of commitment to training and training skills.
A further concern was that learning may be specific to one workplace,
rather than generally applicable.
Registered training organisations emphasised that trainee satisfaction
was enhanced mainly by good-quality training, a good wage and a supportive
employer. They showed an awareness of quality assurance measures which,
if implemented, would enhance the effectiveness of training that is
conducted chiefly on the job.
How trainees view fully on-the-job training
Overall, trainees reported satisfaction with their training, but raised
some concerns regarding teaching materials, assessment and training
providers. Trainees’ perceptions were identified more in terms of their
level of satisfaction in relation to various components of their training,
rather than specific advantages or disadvantages. In general, the trainees’ statements
regarding training processes and content were less articulate than those
obtained from the registered training organisations.
Strengths and weaknesses
In general, trainees considered that on-the-job training is a ‘good
way to learn’. In particular, it was significant to trainees that they
are able to work/learn at their own pace. Trainees valued the fact that
a certificate could be obtained while working a normal job.
Weaknesses were related primarily to organisational issues; for example,
repetitive module content, lack of support from the registered training
organisations and lack of feedback on performance. Trainees appeared
particularly concerned with various factors relating to their interactions
with the training organisations. Nevertheless, the majority of trainees
were still willing to ‘recommend their registered training organisation
to a friend’.
Improving fully on-the-job training
One benefit of understanding the perceptions of stakeholders of fully
on-the-job training is the opportunity to identify areas for improvement,
aimed to increase training effectiveness. Registered training organisations’ and
trainees’ reports of weaknesses as well as levels of trainee satisfaction
are particularly constructive in this process. Findings from stakeholders,
together with some secondary research of literature, have contributed
to the following list of areas for improvement and possible solutions:
- Facilitate networking among trainees: trainees should discuss
their progress and on-the-job training experiences via:
- computer-assisted networks; for example, computer-supported collaborative
learning
- an organised schedule of regular meetings as part of the training.
- Facilitate time management: trainees should be assisted
in preparing a realistic schedule, and training should include time-management
skills.
- Strengthen theory training: theory training materials must
be relevant and accurate and time must be allocated for this training
to ensure trainees attain a universally applicable skill base.
- Turn employers into trainers: employers need to be provided
by registered training organisations with an understanding of how
to be a good trainer.
- Value ‘traineehood’ in work culture: trainees’ special
status of ‘traineehood’ should be appreciated in the workplace by
employers referring to them this way and not as a fully equipped worker,
as well as explaining the potential of the trainee to become an effective
workplace asset.
|