|
This study examined the role of vocational education and training
(VET) and occupations in innovative industries and firms. Innovative
industries are those that have implemented technologically new or
significantly improved products or processes. Those categorised
as intensive have contributed to the national expenditure on innovation
after putting particular effort into research and development. The
three over-arching aims were:
- to provide detailed information on the distribution of skilled
(VET) occupations in innovation-intensive industries in Australia
- to provide information on employer, technical and further education
(TAFE) and private provider inputs to training for these groups
of personnel in innovative industries
- to highlight issues for policy-makers both in VET and within
other portfolios relating to innovation at each major level of
government in Australia.
Innovation-intensive products and services are increasingly playing
a substantial role in world trade and thus, competitive success
in innovation-based products and services is a significant and influential
factor in long-term national prosperity. For this reason it is important
that the linkages and communication between innovation-intensive
firms and vocational education and training are well defined and
efficient.
The methodology for the study involved a literature review, quantitative
analysis and case studies.
The following summarises the key results using the framework of
the specific research questions underpinning this study.
Which industries are most significant in undertaking innovation in
Australia?
From the composite index of innovation a clear hierarchy emerges,
with the industries clustered into three distinct groups. These
groups are:
- High-innovation industries: mining; manufacturing; property
and business services; and communication services
- Medium-innovation industries: electricity, gas and water;
wholesale trade; finance and insurance; and transport and storage
- Low-innovation industries: personal services; retail
trade; cultural and recreational services; health and community
services; and construction.
It is interesting to note that the high-innovation group comprises
two traditional goods producers as well as the most recently developed
and fastest growing service industries. It reveals that the more
popular notions of what constitutes technologically dynamic industries
require change. In 2001 these four industries accounted for 33.5%
of gross domestic product (GDP) and 26.3% of employment. The fact
that the share of gross domestic product significantly exceeds the
share of employment indicates the comparatively high productivity
of these industries.
The broader literature on innovation and the case studies identified
an interrelated set of factors which are strongly associated with
high-innovation intensity. The factors include:
- regular upgrading of capital equipment
- strong linkages between producers and suppliers of capital
equipment and other inputs
- competition within the respective industries and product markets
based on product differentiation, reducing cycle times for introducing
new products to markets, customisation, reliability, quality,
design and integrating products and services
- well-functioning linkages between external research and educational
institutions and firms
- customers who require continuous product improvement from suppliers
- regulatory requirements which allow for novel solutions in
meeting prescribed standards
- high expenditure on training.
The eight case study firms, individually and collectively, demonstrated
most, or all of these characteristics.
What is the role and significance of VET provision in Australian
innovation?
Surveys of innovation-intensive industries by the Australian Bureau
of Statistics (ABS) found that firms identified persons in VET occupations
as among the principal sources of ideas for technological innovation.
Skilled production, trade and technician occupations are essential
for the generation, design, installation, adaptation
and maintenance of new technologies. The case studies demonstrated
that innovation-intensive firms regard VET as a critical transmission
mechanism in the diffusion of knowledge and development of practical
skills for a very broad range of occupations. ABS data also show
that innovation-intensive industries have higher expenditure on
structured training as a share of gross wages and salaries, and
provide notably higher hours of training per employee. The case
study firms spent two to four times more on training as a share
of gross wages and salaries than other firms.
A common element across all case studies was that training was
seen as an essential element in the maintenance and growth of their
business, and flowed automatically from their decisions regarding
the pursuit of product and process improvements. This reflects the
bases of competition within the industries and markets into which
they sell their goods and services.
An important finding is that most of the factors which were identified
in the literature review as strongly stimulating innovation were
also identified in the case studies as strongly stimulating training.
This is not a surprising result. The fundamental purpose of vocational
training is, after all, the transmission of economically useful
knowledge. Industries which experience comparatively rapid changes
in the knowledge base of their processes and products require more
intensive training to transmit this knowledge.
What is the occupational profile of innovative industries and
which occupations within innovative industries rely on VET providers?
The high innovation-intensive industry group as a whole has a disproportionately
large share of managers/professionals and trades and advanced clerical
occupations. (There are a disproportionate number of managers/professionals
and advanced clerical occupations in communication services and
property and business services and a disproportionate number of
trades in manufacturing, and mining.) All other occupational groups
are under-represented in the group. However, within the four industries
comprising the high innovation-intensive category—manufacturing,
mining, communication services, and property and business services—there
is very considerable diversity in their occupational structures.
Indeed, the degree of variation in the occupational structure across
these four innovation-intensive industries is as great as that across
all industries.
In other words, taken collectively, there are significant differences
in the occupational structure between the high-innovation intensity
group and the other two innovation groups. However, taken as separate
industries, these differences become much less distinct. The fact
that the association between occupational structure and innovation
intensity of industries depends on the level of analysis undertaken
suggests that the association is not robust.
Another important and related finding is that the variation in
educational attainment within the innovation-intensive industries
is as great if not greater than that across all industries. This
is primarily due to the large variation in occupational structures
across the four innovation-intensive industries. These results suggest
that the principal occupational groups play a different role, and
are of differing significance in the innovation process within each
of the high innovation-intensive industries. For example, in manufacturing
industry, only 11% of employees have graduate or postgraduate degrees,
compared with 33.6% for property and business services.
These results also suggest that, by itself, educational attainment—in
particular, a high proportion of an industry's workforce with university
qualifications—is not a strong predictor of innovation intensity.
For example, of all industries, the health and community services
industry has the highest share of persons with university qualifications
at 40.4%, although it is classified to the low-innovation group.1
This finding is consistent with the literature on innovation
which finds that a very broad range of factors, both internal and
external to a firm and industry, determine the intensity of its investments
in innovation-related activities.
How do innovation-intensive industries recruit, maintain and update
their skills? What problems, if any, do innovation-intensive industries
have in recruiting, maintaining and updating skills provided by
the VET sector?
The study found innovation-intensive firms use a wide range of
training providers. These include TAFE institutes, private providers,
equipment and other vendor suppliers, professional associations
and in-house providers. Amongst higher-level VET occupations, such
as technical officers or forensic investigators with diplomas and
advanced diplomas, conferences, journals and professional associations,
were an important means of keeping up to date with advances in their
fields. Nevertheless, a key role was identified for TAFE in that
six of the eight case study firms used TAFE to supply entry-level
qualifications.
Across the cases studies there was a universal requirement for
entry-level VET training to result in formal qualifications. This
requirement was due to enterprise bargaining agreements providing
for training to lead to the acquisition of recognised, transferable
qualifications. It was also due to the widespread adoption of formal
quality assurance methods which typically require that employees
can document their competency to perform the range of work they
undertake. In addition, larger firms operate formal human resource
management policies in which formal qualifications are used as criteria
in recruitment and promotion.
From the case studies, a typology was developed describing and explaining
the differences in training sources, methods and curricula. Five different
models were identified in terms of the methods and sources used to
recruit, maintain and update vocational skills. The picture which
emerges from this typology is a highly adaptive training system.
What are the strengths and weaknesses of VET provision within
Australia's innovation-intensive industries?
The case studies revealed, overall, a high level of satisfaction
with the public and private VET system. Staff interviewed for the
case studies all commented very positively on training provided
by TAFE, especially in relation to its emphasis on the acquisition
of practical skills. The firms especially valued training with a
practical and applied orientation. This form of training was valued
because it reduced the amount of on-the-job training required for
employees to become productive.
Firms also commented positively on the linking of off-the-job training
with on-the-job work experience, allowing students to apply their
knowledge.
An obvious, although still key, finding was the importance of consultation.
It is concluded that the satisfaction expressed by firms regarding
TAFE training was due to the high level of consultation between
the firms and TAFE.
It must be recognised, however, that a crucial basis for the generally
high level of satisfaction and high level of consultation is the
large size of the case study firms. The scale of training sought
by the firms made it economically feasible for TAFE and other providers
to customise course content, assessment and delivery. The scale
of training also made it feasible for the VET providers to invest
in the development of their own staff which enabled them to keep
abreast of the latest technologies and pedagogies in their fields.
A considerable amount of post-entry-level training was provided,
mostly in the form of short courses, typically with a duration not
exceeding 2-3 days. The case studies and survey data indicate that
a wide variety of training providers were used for this post-entry-level
training. In approximate order of importance, they included equipment
and other input suppliers, in-house training, private providers
and TAFE. A high level of satisfaction was expressed by the case
study interviewees regarding the quality, cost and flexibility of
the training supplied by all of hese providers. Firms sought flexibility
in training arrangements for this post-entry-level training, especially
the capacity for on-the-job delivery and customisation of training
to conform to firm-specific operating procedures and equipment.
All of the case study firms emphasised the need for employees to develop
behavioural skills such as effective team work and to develop problem-solving
and communication skills, including improved literacy, numeracy and
information technology skills. The demand for these behavioural and
communication skills resulted from:
- the requirements of formal quality systems
- the automation of production, requiring operators to have a
higher-level conceptual understanding of production processes
- work organisation change leading to flatter management structures
and devolution of responsibility to supervisors and operators
- the expectation that employees contribute to product and process
improvement through various consultative mechanisms.
There is unmet demand for training in these behavioural skills,
especially related to team work and problem-solving.
Finally, while larger innovation-intensive firms have the financial
capacity and willingness to invest in structured training, other
sectors have significantly reduced their VET investments. This has
contributed significantly to skill shortages in occupations which
are critical, for example, to success in export markets and competing
against imports in manufactured products. This is a concern given
that, to be competitive, innovation-intensive sectors depend on
efficient and technically flexible suppliers of components and services
from all sectors. Without the presence of these clusters of high-quality
and technically agile smaller suppliers, the survival of larger
innovation-intensive firms is at risk. A variety of measures are
suggested to address these skill shortages.
There is a volume 2, which contains the data tables for the construction
of the composite index of innovations, the case study interview
schedules and the case studies, and can be downloaded in pdf format
from www.ncver.edu.au/publications/1451.html.
_______________________________________
1 Aggregation of health and community services
obscures the relatively high-innovation intensity of the health
industry.
|