|
In remote Indigenous communities in Australia there are minimal
labour market opportunities, with the majority of jobs under the
Community Development Employment Projects (CDEP), and limited education
and training services. Yet Indigenous communities are under increasing
pressure from the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission
(ATSIC) and the government to build sustainable communities with
a social, cultural and economic capital base, and share responsibility
for community well-being and capacity building. Simultaneously,
the delivery of primary and secondary Indigenous education is under
great scrutiny as outcomes fall behind commensurate levels
in the wider Australian society. There is also increasing emphasis
on ensuring that ‘culturally appropriate’ vocational education and
training (VET) opportunities in remote Indigenous communities are
made more accessible, so that Indigenous people can gain the employment
skills to ultimately take control of their communities. Conversely,
adult literacy is increasingly seen as a major factor affecting
the participation of Indigenous people in training and the subsequent
delivery and management of services in remote communities.
This study investigates and describes how both the English and
the local Indigenous language are used in reading and writing by
adults, through a case study of a community-controlled health service
in a remote Indigenous community in the Northern Territory. In addition,
it analyses the social context of literacy use (Barton
1994; Barton & Hamilton 1998; Reder 1994; Street 1993, 1995);
that is, how (for what purposes and functions) people use reading
and writing in everyday life in the community. Although Western
education has a short history in the region—schooling was first
introduced in the area in 1969—access to schooling for all children
was only made available as late as 2003.
The case study explores this community’s quest to implement a culturally
appropriate form of health delivery that encompasses not just physical
well-being but also the interrelationship between the social, emotional
and cultural well-being of the community as a whole. The health
service leadership in this community is seeking to develop a model
that integrates the training and employment of local Indigenous
people into a process of strengthening community capacity. Intrinsic
to this process is a growing awareness that an emerging training
and employment model must reflect existing tribal authority structures
and processes, and be integrated into the social and cultural schema
of the community, rather than be imposed from the outside. That
is, the leadership is aspiring to develop a ‘both ways’ model of
community capacity that ensures cultural control in the short-term
and, in the long-term, leads to the development of skilled, literate
adults, who have also maintained Indigenous law and culture, and
are able to manage change and sustain community development.
In this case study, it was found that there is a demonstrated
trust that the institution of Western education will deliver worthwhile
outcomes. Learning English is seen as a necessity and this is interrelated
with meeting everyday functional needs and social obligations. However,
adult literacy levels are generally low and it would appear that
most adults do not have sufficient proficiency in English language,
literacy and numeracy to meet the VET sector’s training requirements.
The provision of vocational education and training in this region
has been ad hoc, short-term and compartmentalised into disconnected
sectors of health and education and from a range of registered training
organisations. Community employment opportunities are minimal and
vocational education and training is primarily linked with the limited
employment opportunities available in the education and health sectors.
A theme that emerges in the study is that most training does not
fit into the meaning and purpose of community life. The connection
between education, vocational education and training and employment
pathways is not linked to any future planning process that takes
account of community aims and aspirations. Consequently, a relevant
and appropriate ‘training culture’ has yet to evolve and become
integrated into community life. The community believes that for
education to be successful and to lead to sustainable outcomes,
it must be integrated into the social and cultural framework of
the community, and must include community goals and aspirations.
In this community, relationships through the kinship system are
a crucial, cohesive element in an unchanging authority structure
determined by Aboriginal law. Literacy, therefore, is only relevant
if it is linked in a useful way to the prescribed roles and responsibilities
in the community. The mainstream education and training system invests
in the individuals progressing along a pathway towards labour market
employment, whereas in this remote Indigenous context the most important
investment is in the social capital—norms (values), networks and
trust (Putnam 1993)—of the communal whole.
The case study in this report highlights the challenge faced by
remote Indigenous communities. For these communities, the challenge
is to achieve social and economic sustainability without losing
the core values of Indigenous law, culture and language. Remote
communities can no longer afford to be excluded from the broader
national context and this report is not suggesting an isolationist
approach. It does, however, suggest that the key to sustainability
is to find a way to maintain local coherence, and the core values
within remote localities, while simultaneously developing models
of appropriate community development. Training and employment are
essential elements in this future scenario, but emerging models
for remote Indigenous communities must integrate training and employment
pathways that reflect community realities and tolerate alternative
definitions of employment that are characteristic of diverse localities.
New policy changes are needed that recognise the inherent differences
between localities in Indigenous Australia and accept that education
and training needs are not necessarily the same for all remote communities.
Achieving sustainable social and economic outcomes in remote contexts
will be difficult and will involve implementing long-term community
development planning processes that harness the training potential
of the Community Development Employment Project and capitalise on
existing culturally appropriate labour market opportunities. Furthermore,
interagency linking between service delivery sectors will be a crucial
element in any community planning process. The ‘what for?’ question
in relation to education and training will need to be linked with
community goals and aspirations so that literacy learning and use
can be targeted to relevant roles and responsibilities in the community.
|