Aims of project
This project investigates how best to utilise school students’ experiences
in paid part-time work to
enable them to have a better understanding of post-school pathways,
as well as the ability to make
wise decisions about these pathways. We regard these paid work experiences
as being more‘
authentic’ and informative than school-organised work experiences,
since paid work entails an employment arrangement, immersion in workplaces
and the exercise of the obligations and requirements on the part of
both employees and employers.
The specific questions addressed by the project were:
- In what ways can school students’ engagement with paid work
experiences assist them and their
peers to understand work, working life and post-school pathways?
- What kinds of teaching practices might secure these outcomes?
- How can schools best organise experiences to inform students
about work, working life and post-school options?
Background
Preparing young people for life, including working life
beyond school, is an implicit goal of schooling. Many, perhaps most,
Australian school students in Years 10, 11 and 12 engage in working
life through their paid part-time work outside school hours. In addition,
school students are increasingly being employed as school-based apprentices
and trainees as part of their schooling
program. These working-life experiences can be regarded as
a resource that schools can utilise to assist students to
prepare for and make decisions about their transition to work and
working life. This can be achieved by using, as part
of the school-based curriculum, these instances of ‘authentic’ working-life
experiences in classroom-based activities to individually
reflect and collectively discuss and appraise work, working
life and post-school pathways. These paid work experiences can
be maximised by extending students’ understanding
of the value of their part-time work and engaging
them in reflective practices with those students who do not
participate in paid work experiences.
The ‘authenticity’ of these experiences derives
from their real-work context. As part of the workforce, students need
to fulfil the requirements of employees and be subject to employment
obligations. In this, they are distinct from school-organised work placements.
In
Queensland, employers taking school
students on work placements are not required to provide ‘real’ work
or payment for work experience. In Victoria, on the other hand,
the employer offers the student a contribution to out-of-pocket
expenses. However, this research proposes that the paid work experiences
of Australian school students are different from and potentially
superior to these schoolorganised
work placements, because paid work expects both students
and employers to recognise
the rights and responsibilities of their employee–employer
relationship. Furthermore, these work
experiences are usually ongoing and of a longer duration
than school-organised work placements.
Through their paid work, school students can gain impressions
(individually and collectively) of the
different kinds of work in their workplaces and how working
life plays out for different kinds of employees. The guided
reflection of these experiences has rich educative potential for
a critical and
reflective understanding of work and working life. As
a consequence, students will be assisted in
making informed decisions about post-school pathways.
It is important to recognise however that
these work experiences should not be seen as exemplars
but as instances of work and working life
with the capacity to offer insights into the world of
work.
While this innovation has an educative purpose, it also
provides a practical solution to a shrinking
pool of work placements, given the difficulties that
many schools experience in providing and
monitoring these placements. Classroom-based reflections
on students’ paid
work experiences can
become an educational resource—one that is freely available
in Australian schools—and offer the
prospect of considerable savings in school resources
(for example, administrative and travel costs to
support work placement programs). These resources can
then be redirected to other means of
preparing and supporting students for their post-school
pathways. In this context these paid work
experiences have the potential to provide a rich resource.
Procedures
The procedures for this study comprised four stages.
First, schools were approached to elicit their
participation in the project, to gain consent and
to establish the research relationship. This first
stage
resulted in a total of ten classes and their teachers
in six schools across two states (Queensland and
Victoria) participating in the study. To assist
the school environment in being supportive of the
purpose of the study, preference was given to those
schools with a track record in VET in Schools
programs. Second, teachers and researchers in the
six schools were to negotiate ways to meet the
needs of particular classes and students in the
implementation of classroom-based activities designed
to assist students to reflect on their paid work
experiences. This second stage was intended to
encompass working with selected teachers to develop
the necessary classroom-based activities to
assist students to describe and understand their
paid work, thus allowing them to reflect upon
appropriate post-school pathways. Aspects to be
considered during these discussions were the
school’s setting and location, student cohorts, and student
readiness. A framework for describing the
students’ work was adapted from earlier studies and comprised
categories of work activities and interactions. Teachers were encouraged to tailor
this to their students’ needs
and competence.
During the third stage, ten classes of students
in the selected six schools were involved in the
implementation of the research project. Four metropolitan schools in
Queensland and
two in regional Victoria participated. One Queensland
metropolitan school began the classroom activities
in the final term of 2004, with the remaining
five schools in Queensland and Victoria participating
in the first half of 2005. Stage four involved
progressively gathering and analysing the data
and
writing the report.
Findings
The findings can be categorised according to the
following key areas:
- negotiating the procedures established by
the research
- understanding work
- understanding future pathways
- reflecting upon work and post-school
pathways.
The findings also address the teachers’ roles in the
process and advance considerations forvocational education and schooling.
Negotiating the procedures
From the pilot study, a set of classroom
resources was created and basically
adopted unaltered
by all the participating
schools. They were, however, implemented
in quite different
ways by each
school,
which led to distinct sets of classroom
experiences. In some instances, students
and sometimes
teachers struggled with the classroom-based
activities. The variation in experiences
arose from:
- the capabilities of the teacher involved
- the interest and readiness of students
- the
resources for and status of work experience and vocational
education programs within
the school.
This initial finding is noteworthy
as it highlights the centrality of the
teacher’s role and the school’s
commitment to supporting them in vocational
education and training (VET) initiatives.
Understanding
work
Through classroom activities, the students
were able to engage in and present critical,
although sometimes not particularly
considered, analyses of their work experiences.
Crucial features identified included:
- the contrast between the conditions
and roles of part-time workers and
those of
full-time workers
- the unrewarding and unattractive
nature of menial work
- the nature of discretionary
work roles (where they
act autonomously or semi-autonomously)
- differences in work roles
- concepts about and appraisals
of team work
- the standing of
workers and
their treatment (for
example, by
customers and management)
- the requirements
for work performance.
These findings support
the claim that
workplace experiences
derived
from
authentic employment
relationships provide a richer
base for
experiencing
and considering
work
and
working life
than do
school-organised
work placements.
The extent
to which classroom
activities can
produce educationally
worthwhile reflections
on work
experiences
depends on the
work by
teachers,
the depth of
their understanding,
and their capability
to facilitate
this within
the classrooms.
Understanding future pathways
Through their reflections
on their paid work experience, students identified
that they
had learnt about:
- working life
- different kinds of work—their differences
and similarities
- the kinds of work they do not want
to engage in post-school
- the kinds of work they want to engage
in post-school
- their preferred work options
- their preferences for a post-tertiary
or university-prepared occupation
- the relevance of school-based
learning for preparing students for the work
to which they
aspire.
In all, they indicated that reflecting
on and discussing their part-time
employment in classroombased
activities provided opportunities
for considering options for working
life,
for identifying
employment preferences and, in some
instances, for the need for investing
greater effort
at school,
or in tertiary or higher education
to ensure the realisation of their
working
life goals.
Reflecting on work and post-school pathways
Overall, students reported that reflecting
on their part-time employment had been
useful. Clearly, they enjoyed discussing
their work experiences and the opportunity to share experiences
and insights in ways rarely provided
in the classroom or workplace. In addition,
the
discussion
of this topic in class provided insights
for those not yet employed. Even students
who struggled
to
present
their ideas in a written form provided
responses supporting the conclusion
of most students:
that
their paid part-time work was the best
way of understanding work and post-school
pathways.
There
were also suggestions about improving
other ways of learning about occupations.
These
included
advice from teachers, industry speakers
and careers advisors, and access to
electronic resources and
agencies whose role it was to provide
information on forms of employment.
Although these other
resources could provide a welcome complement,
school students consistently claimed
that their paid employment
offered the most effective educational
resource—and
one that is freely available
in most Year 11 and 12 classrooms in
Australian schools. With minimal re-organisation
of school
programs, these class activities could
be accommodated by both teachers and
high school
students
to enable reflection on the world of
work beyond school.
Teachers’ roles
While students bring their experiences
of paid work to classroom activities,
teachers
are required
to
provide classroom-based experiences
to enable individual and group reflection
on paid
work
experiences, thus assisting students
to realise the full potential of those
experiences.
In
this context
it was clear that teachers needed the
capacity to:
- adapt and utilise resources to meet
students’ needs
- facilitate student learning (that
is, draw upon learners’ experiences)
- manage the teaching/learning
process to promote students taking up
productive critical
reflection
- understand the potential of thinking
about work
- expand students’ views about
learning and educational goals.
Levels of teacher competence in their
roles in this area of learning and
innovation determined the
usefulness of the outcomes. Not all
teachers possessed this expertise
or were able
to provide effective guided reflective
experiences. These considerations seem particularly
relevant to other
initiatives aimed at improving information
for school students about post-school
options (for example, career guidance).
Lessons for vocational education and
schooling
In all of the schools, the teachers
used the pre-prepared materials supplied
by
the researchers
with
little or no modification. While this
was successful in some schools, in others
it
led to unsatisfactory
outcomes for both students and teachers:
the uncritical and unadapted use of
externally derived
materials was problematic. Teachers
need the support of school resources,
including
the
capacity to
adapt materials and educational resources,
such as the learning guides and other
non-endorsed
resources supporting training packages.
These materials need to be adapted to
meet the
requirements and capabilities of particular
student groups. However, teachers’ reluctance
to trust
and engage those outside the school
(for example, researchers) who have
specific
knowledge and
who can provide expertise not available
in the school is a shortcoming that
reflects the ‘closed
culture’ of schooling.
The diversity of teachers’ levels
of competence in the areas of work and
vocational education was
surprising. Furthermore, schools’ espoused
track record with VET was not a predictor
of positive
educational experiences. Even in schools
committed to VET in Schools programs,
arrangements
for vocational and workplace-based experiences
appeared marginal, unsupported and unmanaged.
Clearly, additional demands have been
placed on both schools and students
with: take-up
of
school-based apprenticeships; VET in
Schools programs, as well as part-time
employment
after
school and weekends; and the ongoing
pursuit of academic qualifications for
entry into
higher
education programs.
Some schools claimed that vocational
education was already an integral
part of their
operation. However, this did not
guarantee effective and well-managed school-based
activities
associated with
and providing opportunities for understanding
work, working life and post-school
pathways.
Central to the success of vocational
education programs in schools were
the focus given
to the vocational program, allocation
of adequate resources and appropriate
programming.
The research
also found that the demands placed
upon students and teachers should
be more
balanced to permit
the additional activities required
for vocational education in schools
to be
accommodated.
|