|
This paper reports on a research project which set out to analyse recent
research and policy documents on indigenous peoples' development needs
and aspirations, a term used to encompass the full range of issues
and programs sometimes also called 'Indigenous Affairs'. The research
aimed to assess the extent to which current developments in vocational
education and training (VET) research and policy were sufficiently informed
by this separate but related body of literature. A particular focus was
the work of indigenous community-controlled organisations, and the research
methodology involved close collaboration with the directors of the Federation
of Independent Aboriginal Education Providers (FIAEP).
The paper argues that current policy settings and research on the educational
needs of indigenous Australians have been overly influenced by human capital
theory and economic rationalist policy. An historical analysis of the
causes of indigenous unemployment and underdevelopment suggests the need
for an alternative approach to VET research and provision for indigenous
communities and the development of alternative pathways. Aboriginal poverty,
the paper finds, is due not to peoples' deficits in so-called 'human capital',
but to the lack of public or private sector support for alternative indigenous
forms of economic and social organisation. Education and training programs
should therefore be provided to communities to enable those of their members
who wish to do so to raise their living standards in line with their own
communities' development aspirations, rather than always expecting people
to move off their own country into 'mainstream' urban-based private and
public labour markets. The paper concludes that independent Aboriginal
community-controlled organisations play a special role in facilitating
Aboriginal peoples' social and economic development objectives, and that
there is a need for national VET policies and research to be refocussed
on providing greater support to these organisations, rather than pursuing
more narrowly-defined notions of access and equity.
|