|
Publication title: Review
of Research: Vocational education and training for people with disabilities
the aim of the current study was to examine the available literature
concerning access and equity for people with disabilities in relation
to post-secondary school vocational education and training (VET). Specifically,
the study aimed to:
- examine the access, participation and outcomes that are
currently being achieved by students with disabilities in the VET sector
- determine the barriers that continue to confront these
students
- identify the factors that contribute to successful outcomes
- review innovative models of service delivery both in
Australia and internationally
- outline major areas requiring further examination
In terms of access, the review has shown that in comparison to people
without disabilities, people with disabilities continue to have difficulty
accessing post-secondary school training or education. Even if access
is possible, the literature suggests that they have more difficulty in
participating fully in that study and achieving meaningful outcomes as
a result of their efforts.
The remainder of the review is presented under two major headings, namely,
barriers and success factors. The findings in both these areas will be
summarised in this chapter from the perspectives of the three major stakeholders
in the sectors, namely:
- students with disabilities
- service providers (i.e. educators/trainers)
- policy-makers and planners
Students with disabilities
For students with disabilities, it is necessary to recognise that the
VET system is extremely complex and confusing, but there is a commitment
to equity in these systems of which they must take advantage. The review
has suggested that it is important for students with disabilities to assert
their rights and demand access to sufficient information to enable them
to make informed choices. In terms of assistance, the review has indicated
that students must seek assistance whenever it is needed, advise authorities
of any physical access difficulties they encounter or other problems with
support services and contribute to data collection efforts that will improve
their situation. This pro-active approach means that students with disabilities
must become involved in attitude change and must register their disability
needs despite the fact that this process can be humiliating and difficult.
At a personal level, students with disabilities must endeavour to compensate
for their disability-related problems as much as possible and seek counselling
if necessary. They must persevere and maintain their support networks
as these factors will enable them to overcome some inequity issues.
Service providers
Service providers in this industry must recognise that students with
disabilities are confronting numerous inequitable practices. They must
be aware of disability-related issues and must embrace the concept of
inclusion. With a true understanding of inclusion, service providers are
more likely to deliver individualised, flexible and empowering services
that will combat inequity for students with disabilities. At the organisational
level, service providers must ensure that they provide sufficient counselling/health
services and support services that are appropriate for students with disabilities.
They must also ensure that staff receive adequate training programs, information
and incentives to address equity issues. It is the responsibility of the
organisation to maintain standards in teaching practice, to monitor the
appropriateness of support services and to audit the physical accessibility
of their facilities. With regard to data collection, organisations must
ensure that the procedures required from students with disabilities do
not further disadvantage those students. Such procedural ease and clarity
will encourage students to register their needs which will, in turn, provide
institutions with reliable data to illustrate the demand that is being
placed on their resources.
Policy-makers and planners
For policy-makers and planners, the major tasks identified in this review
involve a monitoring and evaluation role whereby they ensure that connections
are made among service providers, thus maximising the likelihood that
adequate preparation and planning occurs for individual students. Monitoring
must also occur in terms of standards and training to ensure the implementation
of policy in practice. Similarly, the physical access plans of institutions
must be monitored with rewards or repercussions being contingent on the
outcomes. Another role for policy-makers and planners is to examine impact
of funding models at the level of the individual student and put in place
mechanisms to protect students with disabilities from any negative implications
of funding. Finally, policy-makers and planners should be responsible
for ensuring that consistent and useful data are collected and made available
to all stakeholders in a useable format.
|