|
In 2005, the National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER)
produced a statistical compendium examining vocational education and
training (VET) students with a disability as a whole group; it also
compared different disability groups, focusing on their participation
levels, achievements and outcomes from VET in 2003 (Cavallaro et al.
2005).
The report found that, on the whole, educational achievements and outcomes
from VET are relatively poor for students reporting a disability,
but there is considerable variability between types of disability.
In
addition, educational achievement prior to commencing VET was found
to have some bearing on students' results in VET. Generally, students
reporting a disability in VET have lower prior education and poorer
outcomes from VET than all other VET students. This implies that
the
poor educational performance of students reporting a disability
may be due to their educationally disadvantaged position rather than
their
disability.
This paper, Disability and leaning outcomes: How much does the
disability really matter? by Tom Karmel and Nhi Nguyen, seeks to highlight
the direct effect of the disability by controlling for the background
characteristics (notably educational background, but also age,
level
of study and field
of study) in a simple statistical model.
Key messages
- The study finds that with disabilities such as hearing/deaf,
intellectual, acquired brain impairment and vision, the actual disability
explains
little, once we take into account other student characteristics
such
as age, sex, educational background and course studied.
- By
contrast, both student characteristics and the disability itself
directly impact on the low completion rates of those with
a physical or mental illness or a medical condition.
Overall, the significant point to emerge is that
it is not helpful to treat students with a disability as one group.
The different
disability groups have students with different background
characteristics,
and
the direct effect of the disability on academic
performance differs
between groups.
Tom Karmel
Managing Director, NCVER
|