|
New apprenticeships are not evenly spread across Australia in proportion
to the spread of the working-age population in each State and Territory.
New South Wales, Western Australia and the Northern Territory have
proportionately fewer new apprentices than their population shares
would suggest (table 6). However, New South Wales and the Northern
Territory, along with Victoria, have experienced the highest rates
of growth in the past year.
|
table 6: new apprentices each State and Territory, 2000
|
|
|
State/Territory
|
new apprentices
|
|
|
|
|
share of working
age population(a)
(%)
|
|
|
New South Wales
|
|
|
|
|
Victoria
|
|
|
|
|
Queensland
|
|
|
|
|
Western Australia
|
|
|
|
|
South Australia
|
|
|
|
|
Tasmania
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Capital Territory
|
|
|
|
|
Northern Territory
|
|
|
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
|
|
note: (a) population
aged 1564
source: NCVER (2000c); data supplied by the Australian Bureau
of Statistics |
Rural and remote Australia is comparatively well served by the
apprenticeship system as shown in table 7. People living in rural
and remote areas account for 32% of all new apprentices yet the
share of the working-age population in these areas is only 27%.
People in metropolitan areas other than capital cities are also
doing well. However, while some two-thirds of the working-age population
live in capital cities, only 59% of new apprentices are in capital
cities.
|
table 7: new apprentices in each geographic region of
Australia, 2000
|
|
|
geographic region
|
new apprentices
|
|
|
no. in training
(000)
|
proportion of
total
(%)
|
share of working
age population (a)
(%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
capital city
|
163.7
|
59.4
|
65.5
|
|
other metropolitan
|
21.5
|
7.8
|
7.5
|
|
rural
|
79.4
|
28.8
|
24.2
|
|
remote
|
7.9
|
2.9
|
2.8
|
|
interstate
|
2.5
|
0.9
|
0.0
|
|
region not stated
|
0.5
|
0.2
|
0.0
|
|
total
|
275.6
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
|
note: (a) population
aged 1564 years in June 1999.
source: NCVER (2000c); data supplied by the Australian
Bureau of Statistics |
|