Independent validation of assessment can play a constructive role in registered training organisation (RTO) governance and continuous improvement, although terminology is often not understood and validation not practiced consistently, according to a research report released today by the National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER).
Begin with the end: RTO practices and views on independent validation of assessment reveals that assessment and validation needs to be incorporated into training packages right at the start to overcome a range of recurring issues.
Getting assessment right to signal the quality of outcomes from Australia’s vocational and education training (VET) system is a constant challenge. Despite the enduring focus and discussion on best assessment and validation practice, there is currently an appetite among RTOs for change that values excellence and professionalism in training outcomes.
However, improvement does not require abandoning the current systems of independent moderation and validation of assessment. Similarly, a one size fits all approach is unlikely to achieve nationwide credible assessment and certification practices.
The research asserts that independent validation or moderation of assessment is not a driver of quality but rather a mechanism for identifying recommendations for improvements to the assessment tool, assessment process or assessment outcome. It can also build stronger relationships between RTOs and employers and serve to improve the industry relevance of training.
Further, a mechanism to feedback to the training package developers any difficulties experienced with the content of training packages and assessment requirements is sought after.
Background
This report seeks to better understand the persistent issues relating to RTO practices in conducting independent moderation and validation of assessment, and the role industry plays in this process.
Quotes attributable to Simon Walker, Managing Director, NCVER
The quality of assessment in VET has implications for the credibility of VET qualifications and the competence of the graduates who hold these qualifications.
Compliance and good business practice drive ongoing relationships between RTOs and employers. The integration of validation into these relationships is seen as potentially more constructive than any formal validation role for employers, especially since many, particularly those in small and medium-sized businesses, see validation as the responsibility of the RTO.
The report Begin with the end: RTO practices and views on independent validation of assessment is available on the NCVER Portal.
Media enquiries: Deanne Loan M: 0413 523 691 E: deanneloan@ncver.edu.au
About NCVER: we are the main provider of research, statistics and data on Australia’s VET sector. Our services help promote better understanding of VET and assist policymakers, practitioners, industry, training providers, and students to make informed decisions. This work has been produced by NCVER on behalf of the Australian Government and state and territory governments, with funding provided through the Australian Government Department of Education, Skills and Employment.