Maximising confidence in assessment decision-making: Current approaches and future strategies

By Berwyn Clayton, Sue Roy, Robin Booth, Robyn House Research report 20 April 2004 ISBN 1 74096 164 1

Description

This report provides a literature review and history of approaches to quality assurance of assessment in the vocational education and training (VET) sector in Australia and overseas. It also examines eight potential models that can be used by individual or groups of assessors within a training organisation. The models include a diagnostic assessment tool, an assessment principles checklist, and guidelines for the development of assessment instruments. The report provides background to the development of the resource kit.

Summary

Executive summary

The research for this project was conducted from December 1999 through to November 2000. This project is about the need for strategies to improve the quality of assessment. Much of the research and recommended strategies from this project informed a series of guides developed by the Australian National Training Authority (ANTA) to provide assessors with a range of practical tools and resources for improving assessment practices.

In July 2001 the Australian Quality Training Framework focussed on assessment by strengthening the requirements of registered training organisations regarding their assessment processes and systems. The framework absorbed the National Assessment Principles, recognising that assessment must be valid, reliable, fair and flexible. New requirements have been placed on assessors and registered training organisations to achieve these principles.

This research project identified a range of strategies for validating assessment and identified critical areas where strategies are essential to increase assessor confidence. An extensive review of the literature was conducted, revealing that all research recommended the strengthening of quality assurance as a principal strategy for improving the assessment process.

While there is extensive literature on validity, reliability and moderation in educational testing, particularly in the United States, there is limited material on strategies for quality assuring assessment in a competency-based environment. The systems in the United Kingdom and New Zealand offered a range of options that have some applicability to the Australian VET environment.

The review of the literature reveals that Australian information on possible models and working examples is relatively limited. However, eight models have been drawn that have the potential to be used by individual or groups of assessors within a registered training organisation to support improved assessment practice and decision-making (see p.28).

In addition to this report, a resource for assessors and training provider managers was also developed, called Maximising confidence in assessment decision-making: Resource kit for assessors.

Download

TITLE FORMAT SIZE
nr9029_2 .pdf 488.0 KB Download