This publication presents information about students’ intentions to complete a vocational education and training (VET) course.
This document provides a summary of the feedback received to a discussion paper on the Review of the Survey of Employer Use and Views of the VET System and our approach for future iterations of the survey. The discussion paper sought feedback from stakeholders on a range of issues relating to the content and methodology of the survey. The NCVER has used this feedback to identify and define the content and methodology of the survey from 2013 onwards.
The calculation of expenditures per full-year training equivalent in the Annual national report of the Australian vocational education and training system to Parliament includes the application of cost weights. These 'course mix weights' account for the variation among states and territories in the relative mix of high- and low-cost programs and promote comparability of unit costs among jurisdictions. However, changes to the Australian Vocational Education and Training Management Information Statistical Standard, primarily the change in occupation classifications from ASCO to ANZSCO, mean that the methodology applied until 2008 can no longer be used. This paper explains the technical solution to this problem, showing how course mix weights are calculated using a new method based on a set of cost relatives by the subject field of education rather than the funding industry of the course. It also provides a comparison of the two methods.